← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

DHR vs PFE

Danaher Corporation versus Pfizer Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

DHR wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PFE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

DHR or PFE — which is better?

DHR wins this comparison 2–1 across 6 dimensions. DHR yields 0.88% — lower than PFE's 5.73% — and carries a 6.9/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 5.3/10 for PFE (Mixed). DHR wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PFE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, PFE generates 5.73% vs 0.88% — a 4.85% difference that translates to $4,850 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, DHR scores 6.9/10 (Solid) vs 5.3/10 (Mixed) for PFE — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionDHRPFEWinner
Yield0.88%5.73%PFE wins
Dividend safety6.9/105.3/10DHR wins
Growth trend+0.46% vs 5y+0.93% vs 5yDHR wins
Volatility (beta)——Tie
Scale$130.1B$175.5BTie
Tax efficiencyQualified-eligibleQualified-eligibleTie
Overall2 wins1 winsDHR wins

Dimension by dimension

PFE wins on yield (5.73% vs 0.88%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $485 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

PFE's higher yield (5.73%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus DHR's 0.88% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

DHR: 0.88%PFE: 5.73%

DHR wins on safety (6.9/10 vs 5.3/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. DHR scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

DHR (6.9/10) scores 1.6 points higher than PFE (5.3/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

DHR: 6.9/10PFE: 5.3/10

DHR shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

DHR's yield is 0.46% above its 5y average, versus 0.93% for PFE. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

DHR: +0.46% vs 5yPFE: +0.93% vs 5y

Volatility comparison unavailable

Beta data missing for one or both tickers.

DHR: —PFE: —

Comparable scale ($130.1B vs $175.5B)

Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.

DHR: $130.1BPFE: $175.5B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

Full breakdown per ticker: are DHR dividends qualified and are PFE dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.

DHR: Qualified-eligiblePFE: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

DHR or PFE — which is better?

DHR is better on our scoring, winning 2–1 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. DHR wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PFE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Which is better for income, DHR or PFE?

DHR wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PFE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

DHR vs PFE: which has a higher dividend yield?

DHR yields 0.88% and PFE yields 5.73%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $485 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is DHR or PFE a safer dividend in 2026?

DHR scores 6.9/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. PFE scores 5.3/10 (Mixed). DHR is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, DHR or PFE?

DHR's yield is 0.46% above its 5y average, versus 0.93% for PFE. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

DHR vs PFE: which is more tax-efficient?

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

Compare both against your actual holdings

Put DHR and PFE into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding DHR diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.