Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ARCC vs MAIN
Ares Capital Corporation versus Main Street Capital Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
ARCC wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but MAIN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ARCC | MAIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 10.26% | 8.06% | ARCC wins |
| Dividend safety | 3.8/10 | 3.4/10 | ARCC wins |
| Growth trend | +1.26% vs 5y | +1.86% vs 5y | ARCC wins |
| Volatility (beta) | — | — | Tie |
| Scale | $13.5B | $5.1B | ARCC wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 4 wins | 0 wins | ARCC wins |
Dimension by dimension
ARCC wins on yield (10.26% vs 8.06%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $220 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
ARCC's higher yield (10.26%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus MAIN's 8.06% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
ARCC wins on safety (3.8/10 vs 3.4/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. ARCC scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
ARCC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
ARCC's yield is 1.26% above its 5y average, versus 1.86% for MAIN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
Volatility comparison unavailable
Beta data missing for one or both tickers.
ARCC is 2.7× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ARCC or MAIN?
ARCC wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but MAIN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ARCC vs MAIN: which has a higher dividend yield?
ARCC yields 10.26% and MAIN yields 8.06%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $220 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ARCC or MAIN a safer dividend in 2026?
ARCC scores 3.8/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. MAIN scores 3.4/10 (Risky). ARCC is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ARCC or MAIN?
ARCC's yield is 1.26% above its 5y average, versus 1.86% for MAIN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ARCC vs MAIN: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when ARCC vs MAIN data updates.
Already own ARCC or MAIN? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding ARCC to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →